[UC58] Asset Maintenance History and Inspection Records Analysis
Integrate work orders, outage records, and inspection results into a single asset-centric history, then apply analytical thresholds to surface chronic underperformers — transforming scattered records from disconnected systems into a ranked list of assets that need attention before they fail again.
The Utility Problem
Every distribution asset accumulates a history over its operational life — a record of maintenance interventions, inspection findings, outage involvements, and condition assessments. This history is one of the most valuable sources of insight available to an asset manager: an asset that has required repeated corrective maintenance, appeared in multiple outage records, or shown a consistent pattern of degrading inspection results is telling a story about its reliability trajectory. Acting on that story early — before the next failure — is the core promise of condition-based and predictive asset management.
In practice, however, this history is rarely accessible in a coherent, asset-centric form. Maintenance records live in the work order management system. Outage involvement is recorded in the OMS. Inspection results may exist in a separate inspection management system, a shared drive of PDFs, or paper files in a district office. These systems are not integrated, and none of them provides a unified, chronological view of everything that has happened to a specific asset over its lifetime. When an engineer wants to investigate a suspect transformer or cable section, they must manually pull records from multiple systems, cross-reference asset identifiers that may not be consistent across those systems, and assemble the history by hand — a process that can take hours for a single asset.
The inability to efficiently query asset history also means that recurring issues go unrecognized at scale. A fuse that has been replaced three times in five years, a cable section that appears in outage records every winter, or a transformer that has failed inspection on consecutive cycles — these patterns exist in the data but are invisible without a system capable of filtering and aggregating maintenance and inspection records across the full fleet. Without that capability, recurring issues are addressed reactively, one event at a time, rather than being identified as systemic problems deserving a coordinated intervention.
Awesense’s use cases are constantly evolving. Request free access to our Sandbox trial and GitHub repository to see the full use case descriptions and implementations, and to learn how you can create new use cases yourself.